On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 12:18:16PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On 6/4/06, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: > >On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 12:18:39AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote: > >> Too many excuses. All inadequate. > >> It is past time that the covert actions of the "small cabal" > >> were openly reviewed. The license (for convenience), any > >> relevant written promises from Sun (if any), and any relevant > >> written legal opinions from counsel (if any) should forthwith > >> be posted to debian-legal. > >For those playing along at home, Mike isn't a Debian developer, doesn't > >maintain any packages, and isn't a new-maintainer applicant. He doesn't > >even seem to be a regular participant on the debian-legal list. > None of those things seem to be relevant. For those still playing, Olaf also isn't a Debian developer, doesn't maintain any packages, and isn't a new-maintainer applicant. He's made something like 5 posts to debian-legal, though, which I guess given Andrew Donnellan's assertion that someone with one post ever on -legal is a "regular participant", means Olaf is a senior analyst or something. As beautiful as this irony is of a non-developer asserting on a developer list that being involved in development is irrelevant, you might want to give some thought to the question of why a non-developer making demands of anyone might be seen as doubly-inappropriate. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature