[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL

Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> However, Option 1 was the consensus of this list, and thus we've been
> overridden[0]. I feel that we now need to figure out why the project as
> a whole has rejected the draft position statement [2]

-=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[   ] Choice 1: pi = 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820
[   ] Choice 2: pi = 3.14
[   ] Choice 3: pi = 3 [needs legislature of Indiana approval]
[   ] Choice 4: further discussion
-=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Attempts to legislate pi are always questionable, and when you ask a
majority of uninformed voters[3] to choose between items, it's natural
for the compromise to win, and not unheard of for it to end up "3".

see shy jo

[3] ie, people such as myself who might have appeared to read every message
    on every thread on this list, but IANAL and didn't have time/energy to
    follow each argument in depth

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: