Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> However, Option 1 was the consensus of this list, and thus we've been
> overridden[0]. I feel that we now need to figure out why the project as
> a whole has rejected the draft position statement [2]
-=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
25a628e9-d88e-40x7-8e1c-888cff421ea5
[ ] Choice 1: pi = 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820
[ ] Choice 2: pi = 3.14
[ ] Choice 3: pi = 3 [needs legislature of Indiana approval]
[ ] Choice 4: further discussion
-=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Attempts to legislate pi are always questionable, and when you ask a
majority of uninformed voters[3] to choose between items, it's natural
for the compromise to win, and not unheard of for it to end up "3".
--
see shy jo
[3] ie, people such as myself who might have appeared to read every message
on every thread on this list, but IANAL and didn't have time/energy to
follow each argument in depth
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature