[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GPL v3 Draft

On 1/17/06, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
> * Bernhard R. Link:
> > But it lists no conditions that that stuff is in any way free.
> > When I do not misread it, it would even Microsoft to take any
> > GPLv3 program, extend it, build an API around the extensions
> > and distribute it together with their Operating system, only
> > having to give the source without any of their extensions.
> They already do this with Interix.  As you write, it's a GPLv2
> violation.

Sez who? (Besides you, that is.) BTW, care to explain what you
(and GPLv3) mean by contractually not defined terms "extension",
"subunit", and whatnot other gibberish I just don't recall at the


Reply to: