Re: GPL v3 Draft
* Bernhard R. Link:
> But it lists no conditions that that stuff is in any way free.
> When I do not misread it, it would even Microsoft to take any
> GPLv3 program, extend it, build an API around the extensions
> and distribute it together with their Operating system, only
> having to give the source without any of their extensions.
They already do this with Interix. As you write, it's a GPLv2
violation. I'm surprised that the FSF suddenly cares so much about
proprietary operating systems, although free and usable operating
systems have been created since the last GPL revision.
Reply to: