[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GPLv3 drafting process explained



On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:46:20 +0100 Dalibor Topic wrote:

> Francesco Poli wrote:
> 
> > Should debian-legal@lists.debian.org be signed up directly (provided
> > this is possible *at all*!), in your opinion?
> 
> No, please.

Why do you think so?
Could you elaborate?

Perhaps because you think that several debian-legal subscribers won't be
interested?
Or rather because you think that subscribing a mailing list to another
one is not a good idea (from a technical point of view)?
Or because [fill in the blank, please]?

> 
> > Or do you think signing up individual personal e-mail addresses
> > would be better?
> 
> Yes, please.


P.S.:
Last time I checked, the code of conduct[1] recommended to reply
to the list only, *unless* the original poster explicitly request to be
Cc:ed.
I'm a debian-legal subscriber and I didn't ask to be Cc:ed (or
To:ed...): please avoid replying to me directly. Thanks.

[1] http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct


-- 
    :-(   This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS?   ;-)
......................................................................
  Francesco Poli                             GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgp5qOhepmFPJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: