Re: Dissident test (was re: CDDL)
>I think the point here is that a licence doesn't discriminate against such
>groups, it only forbids anonymous changes from being distributed.
Yes. If "something bad happens to the user" (I will not call this
"discrimination") in some improbable made up situation it is obviously
incidental and not intended by the license. So I do not believe that
it is appropriate to stretch the DFSG to cover this as "discrimination".