Re: License question about regexplorer
Bill Allombert <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I disagree with that. Debian is an online organisation and discussion
> and decision need to happen online. Noone is prevented to read
People are heavily discouraged from reading debian-legal because it's
full of huge amounts of masturbation. It's not -legal's job to define
the standards by which Debian determines freedom - it's legal's job to
determine whether a specific license meets those.
> I will probably not able to attend debconf 5, but even if I were,
> I would not be able to usefully participate to a DFSG session, because
> nobody understand me when I speak English and I understand half what
> others say. So one way or another, you will not have my input that way.
That's unfortunate. However, holding the discussion on -legal guarantees
that we won't have the input of many developers.
Matthew Garrett | email@example.com