Re: License question about regexplorer
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:53:29PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Bill Allombert <ballombe@master.debian.org> wrote:
>
> > I disagree with that. Debian is an online organisation and discussion
> > and decision need to happen online. Noone is prevented to read
> > debian-legal.
>
> People are heavily discouraged from reading debian-legal because it's
> full of huge amounts of masturbation. It's not -legal's job to define
> the standards by which Debian determines freedom - it's legal's job to
> determine whether a specific license meets those.
>
> > I will probably not able to attend debconf 5, but even if I were,
> > I would not be able to usefully participate to a DFSG session, because
> > nobody understand me when I speak English and I understand half what
> > others say. So one way or another, you will not have my input that way.
>
> That's unfortunate. However, holding the discussion on -legal guarantees
> that we won't have the input of many developers.
Sure, we can discuss that on debian-project instead.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Reply to: