Re: Bittorrent licensing, take 2 [MPL and Jabber inside]
Le mercredi 30 mars 2005 à 22:42 +0000, MJ Ray a écrit :
> Can you give a reference for the discussion, please? The Jabber
> licence preamble appears to contradict the licence text and I'm
> not sure if they're significant. I didn't find matches for legal
> in the time around the Sep 2001 package licence change.
Indeed, but I couldn't find any references telling the JOSL is non-free.
It seems it was uploaded without checking the license...
> jabber.org claims that the jabberd (which I think is what debian
> has) is under the GPL. Most of the orig.tar.gz files I checked
> offered JOSL and GPLv2+ as alternatives. Maybe the debian/copyright
> file is just out-of-date?
That means distributing jabber isn't a problem, fixing the copyright
file should be enough.
> > Unless I'm missing something, we are not respecting these licenses when
> > distributing Mozilla and Jabber in the unstable tree, where the source
> > files aren't kept for 6 months as they should. I don't recall seeing
> > this discussion before, and it strikes me, as, DFSG-free or not, we are
> > violating these people's copyrights. Is there a way to deal with such an
> > issue?
> Yes. We apologise and stop distributing things under licences
> with which the archive network can't comply, even if it's
> not a DFSG problem.
That means stopping to distribute mozilla? That's a great pain. It seems
that mozilla's relicensing effort is advancing ; maybe we are at a time
where we can drop the un-relicensed files. The firefox and thunderbird
case is more problematic, as they are released only under the MPL.
> I can't think of another way, apart from
> redesigning the mirror software.
Just when we are considering to drop some architectures to spare some
.''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\
: :' : firstname.lastname@example.org
`. `' email@example.com
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom