Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies (Was: firmware status for eagle-usb-*)
* Raul Miller (firstname.lastname@example.org) [041028 16:25]:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 01:20:12AM -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
> > In the goal of seeking consistency, I think this requires mass bug
> > filing against packages with unmet dependencies, including:
> We have traditionally ignored boot loaders because they're outside
> our scope. The reason they're outside our scope is not because we don't
> treat them as software but that we can't take control of a system without
> using a boot loader.
Ah, and the different to firmware is? I was considering to support
removal of firmware from main, but your reason changes my mind.
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C