Re: non-free firmware: driver in main or contrib?

[Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> wrote:

> 'Main' is what we ship.  Splitting it into two parts and calling one part
> something else does not make it any different.  If you're going to try to
> amend the social contract, you might as well amend itto allow non-free
> firmware into main (after satisfactorily defining 'firmware', of course).

I think there's a difference, but as Raul said, this is not the place to
have this discussion.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.legal@srcf.ucam.org