Re: non-free firmware: driver in main or contrib?
Adam McKenna <email@example.com> wrote:
> 'Main' is what we ship. Splitting it into two parts and calling one part
> something else does not make it any different. If you're going to try to
> amend the social contract, you might as well amend itto allow non-free
> firmware into main (after satisfactorily defining 'firmware', of course).
I think there's a difference, but as Raul said, this is not the place to
have this discussion.
Matthew Garrett | firstname.lastname@example.org