Re: non-free firmware: driver in main or contrib?
Matthew Garrett <email@example.com> writes:
> main. We argued that this was not allowed under the social contract and
> the DFSG, and in the end people were forced to agree. I am now arguing
> that the social contract gives us no right to engage in this form of
> historical practice - given the current wording of the social contract,
> I think you'll find it difficult to argue otherwise.
OK. What course of action do you advocate? So far I hear you telling
other people they're wrong -- useful if they are, not so useful if
they're the least wrong of all possible arguments -- but I haven't
heard what you'd like to do about the firmware issue.
Brian Sniffen firstname.lastname@example.org