Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-*
> josh.trip@verizon.net wrote:
> >be provided while keeping the packages in contrib), but I didn't see
> >anything where you argued that a package in main that requires software
> >not in our archive was not a violation of Policy and the Social Contract
> >(other than many unsupported assertions that only the hardware required
> >the firmware, not the driver).
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:56:09AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I obviously consider this assertion well supported and central to my
> point.
This is not at all obvious given the lack of concrete support for the
idea that the driver will perform just as well without the proper firmware
as with, in cases which require firmware download to the device.
--
Raul
Reply to: