On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:48:09 -0400 Raul Miller wrote:
> Huh?
>
> What makes you think we'd be required to keep the name "abiword" in
> every derivative work?
Perhaps the fact that I missed the "some" in your phrase... :p
I apologize for the misunderstanding.
[...]
> Basic logic.
Ah, OK.
>
> But not basic logic about "permission to modify". Instead, basic
> logic about "what do trademark restrictions mean".
>
> I don't see that trademark prohibitions can affect whether a GPLed
> program is DFSG free or not.
Could you elaborate this further?
If you are right, I think we would be able to deal with the unfortunate
Debian logo issue in a much easier way.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgp3VuRraATX9.pgp
Description: PGP signature