Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG : QPL 3b argumentation.

[Josh Triplett <josh.trip@verizon.net>]

Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:
>>We should concentrate on the real problems, namely the clause of
>>venue and QPL 6c, which i have ground to believe will be no problem
>>for upstream anymore, altough i have no official answer yet, and QPL
>>3b, which still remains problematic.
> 
> Does that actually mean QPL 6 will be removed from the OCaml license?
> Oh Frabjuous Day!
> 
> Or just QPL 6c?  That would not be frabjuous, but I still might
> callay.

What is your objection to 6a and 6b?  I personally think 6c is the only
problematic part of 6.

- Josh Triplett

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature