[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG : QPL 3b argumentation.



On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:22:04PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> The law already makes it illegal to tamper with copyright notices; a
> license doesn't need to say that in order to make it wrong to do so.
> Perhaps it could just be left out?

Given that lawyer wrote this licence, why did they add it. And in any case,
what harm is there to do so ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: