Re: GPL-compatible, copyleft documentation license
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 09:59:45PM -0400, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> >>However, even though the GPL allows for a broad interpretation of
> >>"Program", the GPL hasn't been designed to be applied to non-programs
> >>which are often distributed in a form that is not machine-readable
> >>(see Francesco's message).
> >
> >This is a non-issue. It's also silly. There is no infrastructure for
> >distributing things that aren't machine-readable in Debian.
>
> Well, sometimes we do that T-shirt thing.
We *sell* those :P
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- GPL-compatible, copyleft documentation license
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: GPL-compatible, copyleft documentation license
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: GPL-compatible, copyleft documentation license
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: GPL-compatible, copyleft documentation license
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: GPL-compatible, copyleft documentation license
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: GPL-compatible, copyleft documentation license
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: GPL-compatible, copyleft documentation license
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: GPL-compatible, copyleft documentation license
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: GPL-compatible, copyleft documentation license
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: GPL-compatible, copyleft documentation license
- From: Evan Prodromou <evan@debian.org>