On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 10:37:16AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> Your license doesn't give me permission to publicly perform the work, > >> or to broadcast it. > > > > True enough. Neither does the GNU GPL. Why is this not a problem for the > > GNU GPL? > > The GPL was designed to be applied to computer programs. A license > explicitly labeled as "documentation license" should address this > issue. I call bullshit. Who said it was designed to be applied to computer programs? It addresses anything that could be necessary for a work classified as "literary". Trying to claim that it's necessary to "address" other issues is the classic introduction to a non-free license. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature