Re: GPL-compatible, copyleft documentation license
* Andrew Suffield:
> All of which is belied by the fact that the GPL contains a very
> careful definition of "Program" which has obviously been crafted to
> apply to any literary work.
The definition of "Program" in the GPL is about as precise as the
definition of "Point" in Euclidean Geometry.
However, even though the GPL allows for a broad interpretation of
"Program", the GPL hasn't been designed to be applied to non-programs
which are often distributed in a form that is not machine-readable
(see Francesco's message).
Reply to: