Re: DRAFT: debian-legal summary of the QPL
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
>>Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>>> Until that's done, there's no intrinsic reason for
>>> debian-legal's idea about the location of the line to be better than
>>> anyone else's opinion.
>>
>>We've thought about it and discussed it; they haven't! That is an
>>intrinsic reason!
>
> That's a shit reason. I've thought about it and discussed it. My line is
> somewhere completely different to yours. By that argument, my opinion is
> just as good as debian-legal's.
Did you notice that you're part of debian-legal? We consider you a regular
already. :-)
--
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Reply to: