On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 01:37:46 +0100 MJ Ray wrote: > > We must also collect some sort of license database, so as we can say > > "this package is solely under the L license, hence it cannot be > > DFSG-free for sure". > > What does this do that a database of summaries indexed by licence > wouldn't? Nothing more. Actually a database of package review summaries indexed by license would be perfectly fine, IMHO. Anyway, sometimes we have a fairly large number of packages that include L-licensed material: in that case it seems (at least to me) a bit weird if we focused on *one* particular package, rather than on the license L itself. -- | GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 | $ fortune Francesco | Key fingerprint = | Q: What is purple Poli | C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 | and commutes? | 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 | A: A boolean grape.
Description: PGP signature