[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DRAFT: debian-legal summary of the QPL



On 2004-07-14 22:31:12 +0100 Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> wrote:

[...] in that case it seems (at least to me) a bit weird
if we focused on *one* particular package, rather than on the license L
itself.

If we can find a typical case, there might be little practical difference. It just feels odd to commit to inventing a hypothetical package for each licence for the purposes of analysis when there is always a real package around.

--
MJR/slef    My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
"Matthew Garrett is quite the good sort of fellow, despite what
my liver is sure to say about him in [...] 40 years" -- branden



Reply to: