On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:17:03AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > Don Armstrong writes: > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > > We now have a LICENSE file and I hope to have addressed GPL 2a with > > > the Copyright file. > > > > The only concern I'm really aware of is that the Copyright file > > doesn't address GPL §2a. I think it will suffice for Debian's > > purposes, > > Do we have a consensus on this issue? Would it then be possible to > remove MPlayer from the list of "Software that can't be packaged": > > http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package > > Andrea Menucci is preparing a package of a CVS snapshot (the latest > release does not contain my changes) that he wants to propose for > inclusion in main. Let's yank it out of the unable-to-package list once it's actually been accepted into the archive. No sense getting people's hopes up until we can push cash on the barrelhead, so to speak. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | De minimis non curat lex. branden@debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature