Re: Bug#192748: Debian-legal summary of the OPL
[I readded the bug report to CC despite of the contradicting MFT,
since it doesn't make sense to exclude it]
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:13:14PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> debian-legal has recently reconsidered the OPL and has determined that
> it is a license that is not free.
> This means that the debian webpages should have their license changed,
> assuming this is possible and that those who hold copyrights agree.
Hmm, I'm a bit uncertain about the copyright of the webpages:
From the footer of the webpages I would conclude that SPI holds the
copyright on all content of the Debian webpages, is this right?
Is this legally safe without explicit statements from the authors of
The scripts that generate the webpages have different copyrights
and licences but I think this is ok, isn't it? (The ones that carry
copyright notices with them seem to be GPL licenced, so they aren't
affected by this bug.
If my conclusion above are right, I think the SPI board has to handle that
Frank Lichtenheld <email@example.com>