Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
> A few weeks ago someone was trying to argue that nobody would do
> this, and that invariant sections were designed to solve a
> nonexistent problem. Now we know the problem is not just
> theoretical.
No, it's still a theoretical problem.[1] The above has nothing to do
with the content of the statements themselves, merely the fact that
they are not free under the DFSG.
The problem is that our non-modifiable political essays might be
removed from our manuals, if the manuals' licenses permitted that.
You have just said you would remove them.
Reply to: