Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
> A few weeks ago someone was trying to argue that nobody would do
> this, and that invariant sections were designed to solve a
> nonexistent problem. Now we know the problem is not just
No, it's still a theoretical problem. The above has nothing to do
with the content of the statements themselves, merely the fact that
they are not free under the DFSG.
The problem is that our non-modifiable political essays might be
removed from our manuals, if the manuals' licenses permitted that.
You have just said you would remove them.