Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
If, OTOH, your only goal is to persuade Debian to accept the GFDL
with invariant sections as free enough for inclusion in our
distribution, I don't see that such a discussion could ever bear
fruit without a concrete proposal spelling out the alternative
guidelines that should apply to documentation.
I don't plan to discuss even small GFDL changes here. I think people
will present a proposal for guidelines for free documentation for
Debian.
The definition of software
that includes documentation is simply the only one that permits Debian
to include documentation at all, and only if it complies with the DFSG.
I've mentioned the other possible choices, so there's no need for
repetition now.
Reply to: