Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
On Monday 22 September 2003 16:58, Richard Stallman wrote:
> If, OTOH, your only goal is to persuade Debian to accept the GFDL
> with invariant sections as free enough for inclusion in our
> distribution, I don't see that such a discussion could ever bear
> fruit without a concrete proposal spelling out the alternative
> guidelines that should apply to documentation.
> I don't plan to discuss even small GFDL changes here. I think people
> will present a proposal for guidelines for free documentation for
> The definition of software
> that includes documentation is simply the only one that permits Debian
> to include documentation at all, and only if it complies with the DFSG.
> I've mentioned the other possible choices, so there's no need for
> repetition now.
Okay, so nothing is going to change from both sides. Now you can stop mailing
on this list.