Re: Unidentified subject!
> You have mistaken the objection. There is no reason to think it would
> be a small fractional increase, especially since little parts of
> manuals--single paragraphs even--are useful reusable bits just in the
> way that single functions of Lisp are.
>
> Reusing a single paragraph is fair use--you don't need to follow the
> license conditions.
This is not true if we are reusing all the paragraphs, by extensive
reworking and reassembly. (Say, to manufacture doc strings.)
You raised one scenario and I responded to that. Now you're saying my
statement doesn't apply to a different scenario. It wasn't meant to.
Let's not mix up different issues--that makes a discussion which
doesn't treat any issue thoughtfully.
Reply to: