debian-legal Sep 2003 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[
previous page
]
Page 3 of 3
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
analysis of latest LPPL revision (2/2)
Branden Robinson
Re: analysis of latest LPPL revision (2/2)
Frank Mittelbach
free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
Matt Zimmerman
Re: free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
Branden Robinson
Re: free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
Matt Zimmerman
Re: free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
Branden Robinson
Re: free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
Steve Langasek
Re: free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
Matt Zimmerman
Re: free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
Andreas Barth
Re: free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
Branden Robinson
Re: free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
Wouter Verhelst
Re: free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
David Turner
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
David Starner
Re: free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
Billy Biggs
Re: free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
Branden Robinson
Re: free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
Andrew Suffield
Re: free source code which requires non-free tools to build (dscaler modules for tvtime)
Branden Robinson
Nathanael Nerode's GNU FDL FAQ has fallen off the web
Branden Robinson
Re: Nathanael Nerode's GNU FDL FAQ has fallen off the web
Mika Fischer
Re: Nathanael Nerode's GNU FDL FAQ has fallen off the web
Brian C
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy
Walter Landry
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy
Anthony Towns
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy
Walter Landry
[OFFTOPIC] Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy
Branden Robinson
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Changing a license of a unmaintained software
Klaus Reimer
Re: Changing a license of a unmaintained software
Mathieu Roy
Re: Changing a license of a unmaintained software
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Changing a license of a unmaintained software
Mathieu Roy
Re: Changing a license of a unmaintained software
Scott James Remnant
Re: Changing a license of a unmaintained software
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Changing a license of a unmaintained software
Scott James Remnant
Re: Changing a license of a unmaintained software
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Changing a license of a unmaintained software
Scott James Remnant
Re: Changing a license of a unmaintained software
Richard Braakman
easier answer for changing a license of a unmaintained software
Mark Rafn
Re: easier answer for changing a license of a unmaintained software
Richard Braakman
Re: easier answer for changing a license of a unmaintained software
Mathieu Roy
Re: Changing a license of a unmaintained software
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Changing a license of a unmaintained software
Dylan Thurston
Re: Changing a license of a unmaintained software
Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet
Re: Changing a license of a unmaintained software
M. Drew Streib
Correct E-mail Names & Passwords
Charles Baker
getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Bruce Perens
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Branden Robinson
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Bruce Perens
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Peter S Galbraith
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Manoj Srivastava
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Manoj Srivastava
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Jeremy Hankins
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Dylan Thurston
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Branden Robinson
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Dylan Thurston
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Bruce Perens
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Walter Landry
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Jamin W. Collins
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Branden Robinson
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Bruce Perens
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
charlie derr
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Martin Schulze
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Branden Robinson
Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
Branden Robinson
Preferred license for documentation
John Goerzen
Re: Preferred license for documentation
John Goerzen
Re: Preferred license for documentation
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Preferred license for documentation
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Re: Preferred license for documentation
Dylan Thurston
Re: Preferred license for documentation
Branden Robinson
Re: Preferred license for documentation
John Goerzen
Re: Preferred license for documentation
Glenn Maynard
Re: Preferred license for documentation
Branden Robinson
Re: Preferred license for documentation
Dmitry Borodaenko
Bug#210317: RFP: libdict -- C library for interacting with RFC2229 dictionary servers
Martin Godisch
Re: Bug#210317: RFP: libdict -- C library for interacting with RFC2229 dictionary servers
Walter Landry
Attribution-ShareAlike License
John Goerzen
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
John Goerzen
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Branden Robinson
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Florian Weimer
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
John Goerzen
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
David B Harris
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Stephen Stafford
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Andrew Suffield
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Florian Weimer
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
David B Harris
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Wouter Verhelst
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Richard Braakman
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Wouter Verhelst
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
MJ Ray
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Wouter Verhelst
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Peter S Galbraith
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Seth David Schoen
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Attribution-ShareAlike License
Florian Weimer
FW: quant job
Azhar Abdul-Quader
A WDL.
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A WDL.
Branden Robinson
Re: A WDL.
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A WDL.
MJ Ray
Re: A WDL.
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A WDL.
Brian C
Re: A WDL.
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A WDL.
Andrew Suffield
Re: A WDL.
MJ Ray
Re: A WDL.
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A WDL.
MJ Ray
Re: A WDL.
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A WDL.
Etienne Gagnon
Re: A WDL.
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A WDL.
Jeremy Hankins
Re: A WDL.
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A WDL.
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A WDL.
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A WDL.
Dylan Thurston
Re: A WDL.
Andrew Suffield
Re: A WDL.
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A WDL.
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A WDL.
Andrew Suffield
Re: A WDL.
Wouter Verhelst
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: A WDL.
D. Starner
Re: A WDL.
Andrew Suffield
Re: A WDL.
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A WDL.
D. Starner
Re: A WDL.
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A WDL.
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: A WDL.
Dylan Thurston
Re: A WDL.
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: A WDL.
Anthony DeRobertis
Unidentified subject!
D. Starner
Unidentified subject!
Richard Stallman
Re: Unidentified subject!
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: confetti (was: Unidentified subject!)
Joe Moore
Re: confetti (was: Unidentified subject!)
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Unidentified subject!
Richard Stallman
Re: Unidentified subject!
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
the LPPL and DFSG 4's patch clause
Branden Robinson
Re: the LPPL and DFSG 4's patch clause
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Unidentified subject!
Richard Stallman
Re: Unidentified subject!
Richard Stallman
Re: Unidentified subject!
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Unidentified subject!
Richard Stallman
Re: Unidentified subject!
Mike Hommey
Re: Unidentified subject!
Scott James Remnant
Re: Unidentified subject!
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Unidentified subject!
Brian C
Re: Unidentified subject!
Peter S Galbraith
Re: Unidentified subject!
Richard Stallman
Re: Unidentified subject!
Branden Robinson
Re: Unidentified subject!
Brian W. Carver
Re: Unidentified subject!
MJ Ray
Re: Unidentified subject!
Richard Stallman
Re: Unidentified subject!
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Unidentified subject!
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Unidentified subject!
Jeremy Hankins
Re: Unidentified subject!
Walter Landry
Re: Unidentified subject!
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Unidentified subject!
Walter Landry
Re: Unidentified subject!
Brian W. Carver
Re: Unidentified subject!
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Unidentified subject!
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Unidentified subject!
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Unidentified subject!
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Unidentified subject!
Richard Stallman
Re: Unidentified subject!
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Unidentified subject!
Brian T. Sniffen
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Unidentified subject!
D. Starner
Re: Unidentified subject!
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Unidentified subject!
Richard Stallman
Re: Unidentified subject!
Steve Dobson
Re: Unidentified subject!
MJ Ray
Re: Unidentified subject!
Mathieu Roy
Re: Unidentified subject!
Steve Dobson
Re: Unidentified subject!
Mathieu Roy
Re: Unidentified subject!
MJ Ray
Re: Unidentified subject!
Mathieu Roy
Re: Unidentified subject!
Matthew Garrett
Re: Unidentified subject!
MJ Ray
Re: Unidentified subject!
Steve Dobson
Re: Unidentified subject!
MJ Ray
Re: Unidentified subject!
Branden Robinson
Re: Unidentified subject!
MJ Ray
Re: Unidentified subject!
Josselin Mouette
Re: Unidentified subject!
Richard Stallman
Re: Unidentified subject!
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Unidentified subject!
Richard Stallman
Re: Unidentified subject!
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Unidentified subject!
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Unidentified subject!
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Unidentified subject!
Richard Stallman
Re: Unidentified subject!
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Unidentified subject!
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Unidentified subject!
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Unidentified subject!
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Unidentified subject!
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Unidentified subject!
Richard Stallman
Re: Unidentified subject!
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Bug#210779: libtunepimp1: give me the license
Branden Robinson
Something for CD vendors page
Craig Small
Re: Something for CD vendors page
Kevin C. Krinke
Re: Something for CD vendors page
Gerfried Fuchs
Export clauses in XFree86 licensing
Henning Makholm
Re: Export clauses in XFree86 licensing
Branden Robinson
Re: Export clauses in XFree86 licensing
Joe Moore
Re: Export clauses in XFree86 licensing
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Export clauses in XFree86 licensing
Brian M. Carlson
Re: Export clauses in XFree86 licensing
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Export clauses in XFree86 licensing
Henning Makholm
Re: Export clauses in XFree86 licensing
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Export clauses in XFree86 licensing
Branden Robinson
Re: Export clauses in XFree86 licensing
Henning Makholm
Forrest Hopper: resume
Forrest Hopper
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Keith Dunwoody
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Richard Stallman
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Peter S Galbraith
GFDL
Richard Stallman
Re: GFDL
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Richard Stallman
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
D. Starner
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Richard Stallman
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Richard Stallman
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Richard Stallman
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Carl Witty
Re: Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
MJ Ray
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Mathieu Roy
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Mathieu Roy
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
MJ Ray
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Mathieu Roy
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
MJ Ray
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
MJ Ray
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Mathieu Roy
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
MJ Ray
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Carl Witty
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
MJ Ray
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Fedor Zuev
Software, vegetable, mineral, was: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
MJ Ray
Software, vegetable, mineral, was: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Fedor Zuev
Re: Software, vegetable, mineral, was: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Don Armstrong
Re: Software, vegetable, mineral, was: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
MJ Ray
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Carl Witty
Wolfenstein 3D license
Ryan Underwood
Re: Wolfenstein 3D license
Branden Robinson
Re: Wolfenstein 3D license
Mathieu Roy
Re: Wolfenstein 3D license
Ryan Underwood
Re: Wolfenstein 3D license
Joey Hess
Re: Wolfenstein 3D license
Jimmy O'Regan
Re: Wolfenstein 3D license
Ryan Underwood
Re: defaming now?
Nathanael Nerode
Re: GPL preamble removal
Nathanael Nerode
Re: GPL preamble removal
Brian T. Sniffen
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: GPL preamble removal
Nathanael Nerode
A solution ?!?
Nathanael Nerode
Re: A solution ?!?
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: A solution ?!?
Mike Hommey
Re: A solution ?!?
Mathieu Roy
Re: A solution ?!?
Mike Hommey
Re: A solution ?!?
Richard Stallman
Re: Does the Official Debian Logo fail the DFSG test?
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Does the Official Debian Logo fail the DFSG test?
Steve Langasek
Re: Does the Official Debian Logo fail the DFSG test?
Simon Law
PennMUSH license concerns.
Ervin Hearn III
Re: PennMUSH license concerns.
Joel Baker
Re: PennMUSH license concerns.
Branden Robinson
Re: PennMUSH license concerns.
Joel Baker
Re: PennMUSH license concerns.
Ervin Hearn III
Re: PennMUSH license concerns.
Brian T. Sniffen
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Re: PennMUSH license concerns.
Ervin Hearn III
Why documentation and programs should be treated alike (was Re: Unidentified subject!)
Nathanael Nerode
Why documentation and programs should not be treated alike
Richard Stallman
Re: Why documentation and programs should not be treated alike
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Why documentation and programs should not be treated alike
Wouter Verhelst
coupling software documentation and political speech in the GFDL
Bruce Perens
Re: coupling software documentation and political speech in the GFDL
Dylan Thurston
Re: coupling software documentation and political speech in the GFDL
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: coupling software documentation and political speech in the GFDL
WebShark
Re: coupling software documentation and political speech in the GFDL
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Why documentation and programs should not be treated alike
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Why documentation and programs should not be treated alike
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
License requirements for DSP binaries?
Thomas Hood
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Glenn Maynard
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Josselin Mouette
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Steve Langasek
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Fedor Zuev
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Simon Law
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Sam Hocevar
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Josselin Mouette
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Anthony DeRobertis
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Nathanael Nerode
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Florian Weimer
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Jan Schumacher
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Glenn Maynard
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Dylan Thurston
Re: Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Glenn Maynard
Re: Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
D. Starner
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
D. Starner
Re: License requirements for DSP binaries?
Nathanael Nerode
GFDL
D. Starner
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: GFDL
D. Starner
Re: GFDL
Joe Wreschnig
use of official logo in app splash screens
Rene Engelhard
Re: use of official logo in app splash screens
Simon Law
Re: use of official logo in app splash screens
Josselin Mouette
FSF has stopped linking to Debian website
Branden Robinson
Re: FSF has stopped linking to Debian website
Branden Robinson
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: FSF has stopped linking to Debian website
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: FSF has stopped linking to Debian website
Mathieu Roy
Re: FSF has stopped linking to Debian website
Richard Stallman
Re: FSF has stopped linking to Debian website
Andreas Barth
Re: FSF has stopped linking to Debian website
Mathieu Roy
a DFSG/GNU FDL quick reference webpage
Branden Robinson
Re: a DFSG/GNU FDL quick reference webpage
Peter S Galbraith
Re: a DFSG/GNU FDL quick reference webpage
Jeremy Hankins
Re: a DFSG/GNU FDL quick reference webpage
Branden Robinson
Re: a DFSG/GNU FDL quick reference webpage
Manoj Srivastava
Re: a DFSG/GNU FDL quick reference webpage
Dylan Thurston
Re: a DFSG/GNU FDL quick reference webpage
David B Harris
Re: a DFSG/GNU FDL quick reference webpage
Manoj Srivastava
Re: a DFSG/GNU FDL quick reference webpage
Manoj Srivastava
solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
Zedor Fuev
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
Peter S Galbraith
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
Dylan Thurston
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
Jérôme Marant
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
MJ Ray
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
MJ Ray
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
Andrew Suffield
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
MJ Ray
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
John Goerzen
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
Branden Robinson
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
Richard Braakman
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem (dadadodo at work?)
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem (dadadodo at work?)
Branden Robinson
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem (dadadodo at work?)
Wouter Verhelst
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem (dadadodo at work?)
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem (dadadodo at work?)
Andrew Suffield
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem (dadadodo at work?)
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem (dadadodo at work?)
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem (dadadodo at work?)
Wouter Verhelst
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem (dadadodo at work?)
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
Sergey Spiridonov
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
MJ Ray
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
Branden Robinson
Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Annotated GFDL
Matthew Garrett
Re: Annotated GFDL
Anthony DeRobertis
Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Don Armstrong
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Andrew Suffield
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: Bug#207932: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Rob Browning
Re: Bug#207932: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Dylan Thurston
Re: Bug#207932: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Andrew Suffield
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Dylan Thurston
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Mahesh T. Pai
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Peter S Galbraith
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Jan Schumacher
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Branden Robinson
snippets [was Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest]
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: snippets [was Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest]
Dylan Thurston
Re: snippets [was Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest]
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: snippets [was Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest]
Dylan Thurston
snippets
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: snippets
Dylan Thurston
Re: snippets
Mathieu Roy
Re: snippets
Dylan Thurston
Re: snippets
Mathieu Roy
Re: snippets
Dylan Thurston
Re: snippets
Joe Moore
Re: snippets
Jeremy Hankins
Re: snippets
Richard Braakman
Re: snippets
Dylan Thurston
Re: snippets
Branden Robinson
Re: snippets
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: snippets
Richard Braakman
Re: snippets
Dylan Thurston
Re: snippets
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: snippets
Peter S Galbraith
Re: snippets
Jan Schumacher
Re: snippets
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: snippets
Andrew Suffield
Re: snippets [was Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest]
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: snippets [was Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest]
Glenn Maynard
Re: snippets [was Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest]
Richard Braakman
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Jan Schumacher
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Branden Robinson
snippets [was Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest]
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: snippets [was Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest]
Andrew Suffield
Re: snippets [was Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest]
Branden Robinson
begging the question
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: begging the question
Branden Robinson
Re: begging the question
Andrew Suffield
Re: begging the question
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: begging the question
Andrew Suffield
Re: begging the question
Dylan Thurston
Re: begging the question
Branden Robinson
Re: begging the question
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Re: begging the question
Branden Robinson
snippets [was Re: begging the question]
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: snippets [was Re: begging the question]
Nathanael Nerode
Re: snippets [was Re: begging the question]
Barak Pearlmutter
begging the question
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: begging the question
Branden Robinson
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Jan Schumacher
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Dylan Thurston
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Andrew Suffield
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
D. Starner
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Respect for Upstream Authors and Snippets of Interest
Andrew Suffield
committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Bruce Perens
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Don Armstrong
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Matthew Palmer
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Mathieu Roy
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
MJ Ray
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Dylan Thurston
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Branden Robinson
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Bruce Perens
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Branden Robinson
Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Brian T. Sniffen
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Re: committee for FSF-Debian discussion
Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible GFDL comporomise: a proposal
Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible GFDL comporomise: a proposal
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible GFDL comporomise: a proposal
Dylan Thurston
Re: A possible GFDL comporomise: a proposal
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Renaming "non-free" archive to "not-free-software"?
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Renaming "non-free" archive to "not-free-software"?
Andrew Suffield
Using portions of GNU Manuals in other manuals
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Using portions of GNU Manuals in other manuals
Branden Robinson
Re: Using portions of GNU Manuals in other manuals
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Using portions of GNU Manuals in other manuals
Peter S Galbraith
GFDL definition of "Modified Version"
Joe Moore
Re: GFDL definition of "Modified Version"
Peter S Galbraith
Re: GFDL definition of 'Modified Version'
Joe Moore
Re: GFDL definition of 'Modified Version'
Joe Moore
License review for lsblibchk
Matt Taggart
Re: License review for lsblibchk
Don Armstrong
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: License review for lsblibchk
Nathanael Nerode
"Software" in common discourse in 2003
Barak Pearlmutter
SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
Matthias Firner
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
Steve Langasek
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
Glenn Maynard
The last update was on 12:41 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 1490 messages. Page 3 of 3.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[
previous page
]
Page 3 of 3
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc