[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise

* Anthony DeRobertis (asd@suespammers.org) [030913 04:50]:
> On Thursday, Sep 11, 2003, at 10:08 US/Eastern, Andreas Barth wrote:

> >What if someone do want to distribute on a DRM media that is per
> >design not copyable (aka the "can't copy"-bit set by definition)?
> Now that I come to think of it, my answer would be "too bad." Such a 
> format is fundamentally incompatible with free software.

I can't understand why, if (and only if) you interpret this delivery
as "binary" and also deliver the free source code on a free medium, so
that everyone can create their own DRM medias as they like.

That delivering only on such a medium is not ok according to GPL, is
obvious. It's also obvious that such a medium is not nice.

   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to: