On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:25:49AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:23:08PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: > > Literally ad hominem means "targeting the man" (how he looks like, > > sure, to take the more simplistic case... but also how he writes, how > > behaves). > This seems a non-sequitur. Are you trying to say that you consider the > pointing out of a fallacy in your reasoning to be an ad hominem attack? > If so, then rational discussion with you is probably futile. Cha-ching. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpPqgkz6kBu9.pgp
Description: PGP signature