Preferred license for documentation
Hello,
I have some documentation and documentation-like material that I am getting
ready to release, and figured this would be an opportune time to ask this
question:
What license do people here recommend for doing so?
I like some of the aims of the FDL (*NOT* the invariant sections), such as
trying to keep things readable with non-proprietary software, but I'd rather
avoid the quagmire of how they're implemented in the FDL :-)
Suggestions anyone?
Specific questions regarding:
* Open Publication License; debian-legal archives show
that it may have been considered free at one time but now is
questionable. Can anyone shed some light there?
* Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike[1] seems to be endorsed by some,
though I couldn't find much discussion. Thoughts?
-- John
[1] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/legalcode
Reply to: