Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
* Mathieu Roy (yeupou@gnu.org) [030909 11:20]:
> And it leads me to another question for the list: when thinking about
> the GFDL, the answer from the list is 'the GFDL is not
> DFSG-compliant', but should we consider that GFDLed documentation is
> equal to non-free software, by disregarding the license itself which
> provide freedoms that no non-free software provides? It's a bit
Sorry, but there is certainly non-free software that provide freedom
equally to GFDL. Should we consider to put this code also in main? I
say "no" to this. If something is not DFSG-free thant it can not be
put into main. [Footnote: I do accept an adequate timeframe for
removal, but that's just a: "Handle everything with care." It doesn't
change that it must be removed in long term.]
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: