On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 13:49, Mathieu Roy wrote: > Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <edmundo@rano.org> a tapoté : > > > Mathieu Roy <yeupou@gnu.org>: > > > > > In some countries, it's accepted as a valid proof of the origin of > > > the email. > > > > A signature made with a secret key that was published on Usenet can > > hardly be a valid proof of anything. > > In some countries like in France it's truly accepted in court like a > valid proof, you just have to follow some rules. I don't think the > France is an exception in this matter. > This is true in the UK as well. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part