Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
Mark Rafn <email@example.com> writes:
> On Wed, 14 May 2003, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>> I don't agree. Just take out the offending part.
> The GFDL does not allow us to take out the offending part - it contains
> sections which are not allowed to be removed.
I think this is want he meant.
> If Emacs + it's documentation is considered to be a single entity which is
> a derived work of both a GPL product and a GFDL product, it is
> undistributable even in non-free.
Not to mention the rest of GNU software providing documentation.
> I personally consider them seperate works which we aggregate and
> distribute together, but the FSF takes a pretty wide interpretation of
> "linking", so I could be in the minority.
>> Jérôme Marant <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> > That's insane.
> We may disagree with RMS on this, but it's not helpful to call him insane ;)
Not RMS. Removing Emacs from main.