Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
En réponse à Henning Makholm <email@example.com>:
> > I'm talking about documentation which comes with free software from
> > GNU.
> Apparently the fact that the documentation "comes with free software"
> does not imply that the documentation *itself* is free. In actuality
> the documentation you are referring to *is* not free. Do you really
> argue that it is OK for non-free documentation to be in main, if only
> the software it documents is free?
The point is whether we can apply DFSG to such documentation. Some
people say it does, some other say it doesn't.
We need to make a decision about this ASAP otherwise we're going
to everlasting discussions.