[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Legal questions about some GNU Emacs files

Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:

> On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 10:20:50PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
>> > But you're right that none of the notices you quote describe DFSG-free
>> > licensing terms. Feel free to join the ongoing quasiflamewar in the
>> > LGPL thread about the degree to which we care about that in the case
>> > of Stallman's essays.
>> If you think so, we're going to have a hard time dealing with this
>> then.
> Why do you think that? It affects a reasonable number of texts, and will

I was extrapolating the "GFDL is not DFSG-compliant" discussion.

> take some time to deal with, but it's not remotely difficult.

How should we proceed? Should we contact RMS directly?
Should a RC bug be opened? Note that we've been shipping theses
files for quite a while now.


Jérôme Marant


Reply to: