Re: Legal questions about some GNU Emacs files
Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 10:20:50PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
>> > But you're right that none of the notices you quote describe DFSG-free
>> > licensing terms. Feel free to join the ongoing quasiflamewar in the
>> > LGPL thread about the degree to which we care about that in the case
>> > of Stallman's essays.
>> If you think so, we're going to have a hard time dealing with this
> Why do you think that? It affects a reasonable number of texts, and will
I was extrapolating the "GFDL is not DFSG-compliant" discussion.
> take some time to deal with, but it's not remotely difficult.
How should we proceed? Should we contact RMS directly?
Should a RC bug be opened? Note that we've been shipping theses
files for quite a while now.