[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Legal questions about some GNU Emacs files

On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 10:20:50PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > But you're right that none of the notices you quote describe DFSG-free
> > licensing terms. Feel free to join the ongoing quasiflamewar in the
> > LGPL thread about the degree to which we care about that in the case
> > of Stallman's essays.
> If you think so, we're going to have a hard time dealing with this
> then.

Why do you think that? It affects a reasonable number of texts, and will
take some time to deal with, but it's not remotely difficult.


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- 
        you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''

Attachment: pgppvHWdOvSqr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: