[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The Affero license

Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net> writes:

> Clause 6 still doesn't come into play if the derived application is
> released under the QPL itself, in which case one has the choice of
> distributing under clauses 3 and 4 instead.
> This is no worse than a GPL'ed library (of which Debian does
> distribute a few).

Ok, I think you're right.  That means the QPL is not actually a
problem, even if you object to all forced publication requirements.

Reply to: