Re: The Affero license
Mark Rafn <email@example.com> writes:
> You're not serious are you? Include "sanitize for undesirable comments",
> re-architect to avoid an insecure hack, setup, house, and buy bandwidth
> for http and mail servers for all these extra things because your core
> service doesn't support those non-features.
I'm not in favor of the obligatory publishing clause.
But it's still a fake objection to say "I decided to impose on myself
a $1M cost anytime I publish something, so it's not cheap for me to
publish it." That's a self-imposed cost.
Like I said "this is because you adopt a high-falutin concept of