[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The Affero license

Mark Rafn <dagon@dagon.net> writes:

> You're not serious are you?  Include "sanitize for undesirable comments",
> re-architect to avoid an insecure hack, setup, house, and buy bandwidth
> for http and mail servers for all these extra things because your core
> service doesn't support those non-features.

I'm not in favor of the obligatory publishing clause.

But it's still a fake objection to say "I decided to impose on myself
a $1M cost anytime I publish something, so it's not cheap for me to
publish it."  That's a self-imposed cost.

Like I said "this is because you adopt a high-falutin concept of


Reply to: