Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license)
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 02:58:54PM -0500, David Turner wrote:
> > > True, but they also typically had access to copy binaries (and
> > > therefore, get source code).
> > "The LPPL makes the controversial claim that simply having files on a
> > machine where a few other people could log in and access them in itself
> > constitutes distribution. We believe courts would not uphold this claim,
> > but it is not good for people to start making the claim."
>
> I wouldn't say it's distribution, but copying.
How does having access to copy a binary imply access to source code?
--
Glenn Maynard
Reply to: