Breaking the thread and changing the subject. On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 04:26:08PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > David Turner <email@example.com> writes: > > * d) If the Program as you received it is intended to interact with > And, the real killer, it fails the Chinese dissident test rather > massively. How so? If the government can't get to your regular data, then there's no reason for it to be able to get to the source code you provide either. I agree with the other concerns entirely. Also, specifying a protocol in a license is a horribly bad thing; HTTP isn't useful everywhere, and requiring you to rewrite the program entirely when the protocol becomes obsolete is missing the point of free software pretty thoroughly. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Description: PGP signature