Re: The Helixcommunity RPSL is not DFSG-free
>>>>> "rl" == Rob Lanphier <email@example.com> writes:
rl> We're currently evaluating our license with this thread in
rl> mind, but does anybody have new suggested wording?
I'm not a lawyer so I won't try to write down the "correct" wording
(whatever that means) but isn't it easy enough to clearly state that
if you modify RPSL-covered code and you *don't* distribute it, you are
not obliged to distribute the corresponding source modifications, too?
That would solve the "chinese dissident" problem, at least (not sure
how relevant the "desert island test", because I agree with something
someone said here, that in some countries, Italy for example, you
can't be punished if you obviously couldn't do something law
"normally" enforces you to do).
Andrea Glorioso firstname.lastname@example.org
Centro Tempo Reale http://www.centrotemporeale.it/
AGNULA/DeMuDi Technical Manager http://www.[demudi|agnula].org/
"There's no free expression without control on the tools you use"