Re: The Helixcommunity RPSL is not DFSG-free
Andrea Glorioso <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I'm not a lawyer so I won't try to write down the "correct" wording
> (whatever that means) but isn't it easy enough to clearly state that
> if you modify RPSL-covered code and you *don't* distribute it, you are
> not obliged to distribute the corresponding source modifications, too?
> That would solve the "chinese dissident" problem, at least [...]
No, it wouldn't, because Chinese dissidents want to share the software
with each other. That's distribution. But they don't want to have to
advertise their activities to the Chinese government.