Re: Regarding linux-kernel-conf and Qt
Scripsit Jeff Licquia <email@example.com>
> On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 08:05, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > What? If there ever was a "anti-Qt movement", Debian has certainly not
> > been a "prime mover" behind it.
> Well, perhaps "anti-Qt" was a poor choice of words. My point was that
> Debian was one of the loudest objectors to the former situation with Qt
> and GPLed code, and that some of the perception of Qt as "politically
> controversial" comes from that debate. Now that the situation is
> resolved, it is our responsibility (IMHO) to dispel that perception.
Ok, fair enough.
Henning Makholm "... a specialist in the breakaway
oxidation phenomena of certain nuclear reactors."