Re: Font license recommendation
On 2002-07-28 23:20:51 +0200, Lars Hellström wrote:
> What license should I use if I want to make a _font_ free software?
Have a look at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OtherLicenses
The Design Science License is especially interesting since it's
CopyLeft plus renaming.
> Originally I was thinking about the GPL, but then it occurred to me that
> this could have unwanted contamination effects on documents that use the
> font. Public domain wouldn't guarantee an open source status.
"The aggregation of the Work with other works that are not based
on the Work -- such as but not limited to inclusion in a
publication, broadcast, compilation, or other media -- does not
bring the other works in the scope of the License; nor does such
aggregation void the terms of the License for the Work."
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, MS@ArtCom-GmbH.DE
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: