Re: Crypto++ licencing
Stephen Zander <gibreel@pobox.com> wrote:
> For the rest, I'll remove IDEA, DSS & LUC from the upstream tarball,
> put that in non-us/main for now, package the IDEA code separately and
> put it in non-us/non-free
Well, like I said, I don't think that you really need to remove LUC.
A vague claim that someone has a patent applies to just about every
piece of software. Unless they start enforcing the patent, I wouldn't
worry about it. If you start worrying too much about patents, you
won't be able to do anything.
Regards,
Walter Landry
wlandry@ucsd.edu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: