Re: Financial Restrictions (Was Re: teTeX Documentation Licenses (A), (D) & (H))
"C.M. Connelly" <email@example.com> writes:
> [From discussion of D]
> TB> The limitation on copying fees mean that these files
> TB> cannot be in Debian, but they can be in the non-free
> TB> archive.
> So the restriction of a ``nominal'' or ``reasonable'' charge is
> enough to cause a problem here, even if there was no real charge
> being made? (I'm assuming that the problem here is with the first
> clause of the DFSG,
Section one of the DFSG says you can't restrict selling.
> Doesn't the GPL say pretty much the same thing in Section 3.b.?
> Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three
> years, to give any third party, ***for a charge no more than
> your cost of physically performing source distribution***, a
> complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source
> code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2
> above on a medium customarily used for software interchange;
You don't have to abide by that section if you don't want to; that
section applies only if you distribute binaries without source. Read
the GPL more carefully, please.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com