Re: Date licenses

To: nicolas.pettiaux@linuxbe.org, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Cc: tb@becket.net
Subject: Re: Date licenses
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 23:02:18 -0700 (MST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 200111050602.fA562Ii05994@wijiji.santafe.edu>
Reply-to: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87g07vxdms.fsf@becket.becket.net> (tb@becket.net)
References: <20011016102927.A6291@dman.com> <20011030022611.D475@212.23.136.22> <20011030141312.C26152@deadbeast.net> <[🔎] E1600cZ-0000Xn-00@bigglesworth.mail.be.easynet.net> <[🔎] 200111040607.fA467EY05392@wijiji.santafe.edu> <[🔎] 87g07vxdms.fsf@becket.becket.net>

    Debian is speaking not so much about what you should use, but what
    would count as "free" in the "free software" sense.

Is that right?  Is that what the issue is?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Date licenses
  - From: "Sunnanvind" <sunnanvind@fenderson.com>

References:
- Date licenses
  - From: Nicolas Pettiaux <nicolas.pettiaux@linuxbe.org>
- Re: Date licenses
  - From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
- Re: Date licenses
  - From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)

Prev by Date: Re: Data licenses
Next by Date: Re: The old DFSG-lemma again...
Previous by thread: Re: Date licenses
Next by thread: Re: Date licenses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread