[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: IMAPD license problem?



On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 02:36:20AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I think UW is really quite close to an unambiguous free software license
> here; if the policy of executing licenses on a case-by-case basis with
> redistributors were lifted, I think the problem would be solved.
> Otherwise, I think we will in fact be unable to distribute UW's IMAPD, and
> should never have done so in the first place.

There's no problem with obtaining special permission to distribute a program
as long as it goes in non-free. It's just a little more onerous on the
maintainer.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
                 We believe in: rough consensus and working code.''
                                      -- Dave Clark

Attachment: pgpp3ieCRqsh0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: